Showing posts with label not. Show all posts
Showing posts with label not. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Qwiki Wants You To Watch Your Search Results Online, Not Read Them

Come 2015, 90% of consumer IP traffic will be rich media. Whether you like it or not, the way you consume information online will change.

Thanks to inventions like Kinect and 3D TVs, the future is all about user-interaction and consumer engagement.  Qwiki is trying to bring that experience online, with clickable, computerized clips of information that you can watch instead of read.

We know the concept is difficult to grasp. That's why we had Qwiki Co-founder and CEO Doug Imbruce come in to talk to us about his company and demo a "Qwiki" video.

It's pretty crazy/awesome.

Produced By: Kamelia Angelova & William Wei

Here's How Startup Qwiki Will Revolutionize The Way You Consume Informaiton

LearnVest Founder: Here's How To Get $4 Million In Funding In 4 Weeks

Words Of Advice For Future Entrepreneurs

Can A 25-Year Old Really Compete With Seasoned Venture Capitalists?

Join the conversation about this story »




Qwiki Wants You To Watch Your Search Results Online, Not Read Them


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/k-XDQ4upKq8/qwiki-doug-imbruce-2010-11

Monday, November 22, 2010

eBay Not Involved In Groupon Sale Talks -- Looks Like It's Google's Deal To Lose

Groupon CEO Andrew Mason on CNBC

Groupon is reportedly entertaining a buyout offer of $4-$5 billion from Google.

In the process, it is shopping this offer to other potential bidders through the press.

One name that surfaced last week as a potential bidder was eBay.  But a source close to the company tells us that eBay is not involved in the talks.

So will anyone top Google's $4-$5 billion offer?

Unlikely.

There are only a handful of companies that can afford to buy Groupon and have some strategic reason for doing so.

These include:

  • Google
  • eBay
  • Amazon
  • Microsoft
  • Yahoo

Of these, eBay is apparently not involved, Yahoo can't really afford to pay $5 billion, and Microsoft has very little strategic reason to jump into this business.  That leaves Amazon and Google.

Amazon buying Groupon would make sense--probably more strategic sense than Google buying Groupon. But we doubt that Amazon would shell out the $5 billion necessary to do it.  Amazon's market cap is $75 billion to Google's $190 billion, so the relative cost to the company would be much higher.  Amazon is also not as desperately in need of a new growth engine as Google is.  So we suspect that if it came down to a bidding war, Google would win.

So now the question seems to be, when Groupon finishes shopping Google's offer, will it decide to pursue an IPO--or take Google's money?

Unless Andrew Mason has an ambition to build the next eBay or Amazon, the answer should be obvious: The company should take the money.  $5 billion is not a bad payout for two years work.  And there's enough that could go wrong in this business that it's likely worth letting Google and not Groupon take that risk.

See Also: Hell, Yes, Google Should Buy Groupon. And Twitter. And Foursquare...

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:




eBay Not Involved In Groupon Sale Talks -- Looks Like It's Google's Deal To Lose


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/-aJe9splCJ0/ebay-groupon-2010-11

CODA Delays Rollout of Electric Car: Why We’re Not Surprised

electric car

Building any car is tough. Building an electric car is tougher.

Automakers must devote time, skill, technology and financial investment to designing, engineering, and cutting costs for what is still far from a mainstream drivetrain.

Even Nissan, whose Leaf won GreenCarReports’ Best Car To Buy 2011, has pushed back delivery dates for the Leaf. 

But a small Californian firm yesterday pushed its own compact all-electric car launch back from next month to sometime in the third quarter of 2011. And we think that puts them in a tough and scary position.

The announcment from Coda Automotive that its 2011 Coda Sedan won't hit the streets until late 2011 comes a week after both the firm's senior vice president of sales & marketing and the CEO resigned.

CODA has said little about the reasons behind this, except that it wishes to make sure the quality of its car is as high as possible.

We can’t say whether that may indicate problems with components, issues with the performance of prototypes, or just the management shuffle. But broken promises are certainly not good for reputation.

What’s the upshot? We won’t be seeing CODA sedans on the road any time soon, at least not in private hands. That’s a shame. 

But we have to be honest: Over the past few months, we’ve become increasingly skeptical that CODA could deliver on its promise to bring the 2011 Sedan to market by the start of the holiday season. Why? Let us count the reasons. 

(1) Very few anecdotal order stories

The 2011 Nissan Leaf and 2011 Chevrolet Volt both have stuffed order books. We regularly hear from, and about, buyers on the waiting list for one or other. But we have yet to hear from a single reader, advocate, or potential customer of CODA. 

Yes, we know Enterprise Rental have ordered some, as have other fleet managers. But ouside of this, where are the hordes of eager retail buyers waiting for their car?

Anecdotal tales of pre-launch excitement, orders and test drives are often a great way of gauging the success of a car. So we're a little perturbed. Just how many retail orders are there? Why don't we hear anyone who has put up the $499 deposit for a CODA Sedan?

If that's you, let us know. We’d love to set the record straight. 

(2) Management turnover

No, it's not uncommon for a company to change executives when switching from development to product launch. But two such senior executives leaving within days of one another surely indicates that something is not well. 

What’s more, the resignations came just days before the 2010 Los Angele Auto Show, an important event for any automaker and particularly so for Coda, which is hosting a cocktail party and offering interviews with executives.

(3) Many press releases, no test drives

CODA has put out regular press releases, providing details to the media of when it planned to launch the 2011 CODA Sedan. We even have an impressive list of fleet purchases the company has booked. 

But to date, CODA has not offered the media test drives--whereas the 2011 Nissan Leaf has now been widely reviewed and driven by most of the major national and international automotive media.

That’s surprising for any company that's about to launch an automobile, and it led us to suspect a while back that the December launch target would be impossible to meet.

(4) Higher price, but lower support?

Let’s get one thing straight: CODA is not a mainstream automaker. It has no model currently on the market; the 2011 Sedan is its first car.

Unlike Nissan with its Leaf, it has no franchised dealers, no company-run showrooms, and no nationwide support infrastructure for when things go wrong.

At fully $14,000 more than Nissan’s 2011 Leaf, CODA is asking its first customers to take an expensive gamble that a previously unknown automaker can provide the level of service and support that is taken for granted with the purchase of any car. 

While Tesla Motors, another non-mainstream electric car manufacturer, has done pretty well with its company-owned showrooms and  growing International support, it sells a $109,000 sports car. When you’ve paid six figures for a car, the service comes to you.

(5) Further delays mean a closing market window

In 2007, when the then-Miles XS500 was announced, it had an initial price of $30,000. Then it was meant to be in showrooms by the end of 2008, though the cost had increased to $60,000.

In 2008, we heard that the Hafei Saibao EV (the car we know now as the CODA Sedan), had passed an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) safety test.  At that time, the car was still expected by the end of 2008

Fast forward two years, and we’re waiting expectantly for the car. Yes, delays are normal in the automotive world, but we can’t help but think the delays facing Nissan's rollout of its Leaf  are not the same ones facing CODA. 

Delaying the launch for another nine months loses Coda its early-mover advantage, since about a dozen electric cars will be on the market by 2012.

And we’re not sure that small or startup auto firms can beat the big guys without some significant advantage in schedule, price, or technology. Can anyone make the case that Coda has even one of those?

This article originally appeared at All Cars Electric and is republished here with permission.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:




CODA Delays Rollout of Electric Car: Why We’re Not Surprised


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/Eb-1ik8WgVE/coda-delays-rollout-of-electric-car-why-were-not-surprised-2010-11

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Angry Birds Not Supported On Older Android Phones

Angry Birds Android

Rovio, developers of the incredibly addictive Angry Birds game, has admitted that it can't get the game to run with "optimal performance" on all Android phones.

In a blog post, the company listed 17 handsets that are not officially supported, and said it was creating a special lightweight version of the game for these phones. In other words, a developer of a popular application now has to make two separate versions for what is supposed to be one platform.

This is exactly the kind of platform fragmentation that Steve Jobs was talking about during his epic rant on Apple's last earnings call. And that Google CEO Eric Schmidt denied during his talk at Web 2.0 on Monday. (Video here.)

Every computer platform has shifts that break application compatibility. Apple's done it with the Mac. Microsoft did it between Windows XP, and has started releasing products like Internet Explorer 9 that won't run on that ten-year-old OS. In the mobile space, Windows Phone 7 is a total break from the decade-old Windows Mobile.

But fragmentation is a particular fear with Android for a number of reasons:

  • The platform has only been in the market for two years.
  • Smartphones are computers, but most users are relatively new to them, and they haven't started to run into the classic problems they know and hate. Now, the shine is coming off. (Aside: just wait until the first major security breach.)
  • Advocates of proprietary software, like Microsoft and Apple, have often claimed that open platforms like Linux and Android are more prone to fragmentation because there's no central body controlling development. (Argue all you want--just saying that this lends credence to their claim.)
  • Android allows carriers a lot of leeway in how they customize the interface. We've seen that strategy before--with Windows Mobile. It didn't end well. (Although Windows Mobile had other major problems as well, like being based on a kernel that Microsoft didn't update for years.)

Other smartphone platforms will run into the same problems eventually, but at least seem to be taking steps to avoid it. Just today, HP announced that every phone that currently runs Palm's WebOS will be upgradeable to version 2.0 when it comes out next year.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:





Post originale: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/tkCdGe11KcU/some-android-phones-wont-run-angry-birds-so-light-version-is-planned-2010-11

Google Engineer Gets $6 Million For Not Going To Facebook (GOOG)

sergey brin cash

Google offering $100,000 cash bonuses is so last summer. Now it's apparently offering seven-figure stock payouts to keep engineers from defecting

Last week it was $3.5 million. This week, All Things D reports that one engineer ended a bidding war by taking a $6 million stock grant.

We've seem talent wars like this before. Microsoft was sued back in 1997 for poaching employees from database company Borland. Google returned the favor last decade, causing Steve Ballmer throw a chair across the room. Now, Google is trying its hardest not to end up on the losing end as the cycle repeats itself.

The trouble with paying these kinds of retention bonuses is that once you start, it's very hard to stop. They're basically giving employees an extra incentive to sniff around Facebook or another pre-IPO startup so they can get a job offer to dangle back in front of their managers.

A lot of employees are always going to be motivated by money, and with the stock no longer doubling every year, Google's in a tough spot. But the company may need to take a hard look at other cultural factors as well. We hear more and more tales of new committees, intra-group politicking, and attitude problems toward new employees, particularly those who come in through acquisitions. Facebook is still mostly small enough and agile enough to avoid those problems.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:





Post originale: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/JWoOSmItD4o/google-engineer-gets-6-million-for-not-going-to-facebook-2010-11