Showing posts with label hit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hit. Show all posts

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Did Those Yahoo Layoffs Hit Early?

There's been a lot of speculation around when these Yahoo layoffs will roll out. As we heard a few weeks ago, Yahoo plans to cut as much as 20 percent of its workforce. We reported that layoffs started taking place two weeks ago, particularly in the Yahoo Groups and Flickr Product groups. But All Things Digital informed us that layoffs would actually be starting around December 13th. But it looks like Yahoo may have started to give pink slips, according to this Tweet from Yahoo senior software developer Zach Graves. Graves writes, "The number of people carrying boxes out of Yahoo tonight is not surprising, nor the last of it."

Did Those Yahoo Layoffs Hit Early?


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/Nx1RqC6gWlU/

Monday, November 29, 2010

Here's Why Rupert Murdoch's Tablet Newspaper Can Be A Huge Hit (NWS)

Rupert Murdoch

You can be sure that whenever Rupert Murdoch does something relating to technology, people are going to bash it. And so it is with his latest venture, an iPad newspaper called The Daily. Internet luminaries have been trashing the idea since it's been out there.

Here's why we think it can work:

  • A ton of people want to take in news once a day in well-curated form. The reason why people don't pay for newspapers anymore isn't that they don't want curated, once-a-day news. It's that they can get curated, once-a-day news faster and for free by typing "nytimes.com" or "huffingtonpost.com" into their browser every morning. A criticism of The Daily is that, since it'll be published once a day, it won't be able to break news fast the way the web does. But most people aren't news addicts who need the news right this minute. They don't want much more than a daily intake of reasonably good news. Tapping an app icon on an iPad fulfills that function just as well, possibly better than the web. By the way, if the appeal of bloggy news is fast breaking news, that appeal is fading for us too -- increasingly, that advantage belongs to Twitter.



  • A ton of people are still willing to trade money for convenience. You can get all the media you want for free -- legally or illegally -- and yet tons of people still pay for music on iTunes and Spotify and for movies on Netflix, because it's fast, painless and convenient. Buying stuff on the iPad, especially with subscriptions, has those characteristics as well. It's been well established that plenty of people are willing to buy apps.



  • iPad owners are mostly rich, and will remain so for a long time. Tablets may be the next wave of computing, but right now people who buy a half-grand device that doesn't do everything a computer does, almost by definition, have good disposable income. And it's going to stay that way for many many years. That means they're more willing to pay for news and that they're great targets for advertising. 



  • Links aren't the only way to promote content anymore. Haven't you heard? The web is dead. Another criticism of The Daily is that since it won't allow for inbound linking and social sharing it won't draw in traffic. But that's not the only way to promote content anymore. If you rank high on the app store, and especially if you're featured, that gets tons of people to buy your app, and has nothing to do with search engines and social media. Ranking high on the app store is not a foregone conclusion, but neither is ranking high on Google and going viral on Facebook. The point is that it's not a dealbreaker for an iPad newspaper.



  • Aggregation works both ways. The Daily will aggregate content form other News Corp properties -- smart. But we're betting the aggregation will work both ways. People will see news from "The Daily, the fair and balanced iPad newspaper" (or whatever) on News Corp properties. That will get people to look for The Daily on their iPad even if bloggers can't link to it.



  • It's a work in progress. Many of the things people pooh-pooh about The Daily are things that can be fixed. No social sharing? There's no reason why they can't update the app to let you tweet out links, maybe to a website that only lets you visit a few times a month like the Financial Times. Only updated once a day? Well, the iPad supports push notifications for apps, so maybe they'll do that. The point is that, like all startups, there's a lot The Daily can do to bob and weave, execute and be successful.



  • It's a good shot at a great opportunity. There are two huge opportunities that make The Daily worth pursuing. The first one is that tablets are the next generation of computing, and that apps there will replace the web. If that happens, negotiating the shift to tablets, both in terms of user experience and pricing/business model, will be as important to media organizations as the web has been, and the app that was there at the ground floor will reap huge dividends. And even if The Daily itself is only a half success, it will still yield plenty of very important knowledge that other News Corp outlets can use. The second huge opportunity is Rupert Murdoch's crusade to shift customer expectations of the price of online news. We don't think that Rupert Murdoch actually believes that he can actually get people to want to pay for all, or most online news. But we do think he wants people to accept that a big chunk of online news can be charged for -- sort of like plenty of people see nothing wrong with pay TV. He does have a not-insignificant shot at succeeding at the latter goal, and tablets are a new front in that broader war. The chance of helping to shift the needle there is also worth pursuing The Daily by itself.



Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:




Here's Why Rupert Murdoch's Tablet Newspaper Can Be A Huge Hit (NWS)


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/aCkIu1oaoTQ/rupert-murdoch-the-daily-huge-hit-2010-11

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Anti-Piracy Lawyers 'Knew Letters Hit Innocents'

nk497 writes "A UK legal watchdog has claimed lawyers who sent out letters demanding settlement payments from alleged file-sharers knew they would end up hitting innocent people. The Solicitors Regulators Authority said the two Davenport Lyons lawyers 'knew that in conducting generic campaigns against those identified as IP holders whose IP numeric had been used for downloading or uploading of material that they might in such generic campaigns be targeting people innocent of any copyright breach.' The SRA also said the two lawyers lost their independence because they convinced right holders to allow them to act on their behalf by waiving hourly fees and instead taking a cut of the settlements. The pair earned £150,000 of the £370,000 collected from alleged file-sharers. Because they were looking to recoup their own costs, the lawyers ignored clients' concerns about the negative publicity the letter campaign could — and eventually did — cause, the SRA claimed."

Thursday, November 18, 2010

IAB: Internet Ad Revenues In The U.S. Hit Record $6.4 Billion In Q3 2010

Online advertising revenues in the U.S. hit $6.4 billion in Q3 2010, representing a 17 percent increase over the same period in 2009, according to estimates presented moments ago by the Interactive Advertising Bureau in tandem with PricewaterhouseCoopers. This marks the highest quarterly result ever for the industry.

Post originale: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/pwRtM0NCox0/