@BrettGlass
"Have users pay for the resources they use? Oh, horrors! "
Internet access is NOT resource as electricity or water. It is not resource that must be produced as those and than used. If I use x amount of water or electricity producer needs to make/purify it and deliver it to me and than it is gone from the system as I use it, more needed to be made.
Internet access as name implies is ACCESS to something. We pay for ability to access any Internet content at any time with only price difference being how fast we can get to it (and that is fair pricing distinction).
Say that I and my neighbour pay for the same tier of Internet access to the same ISP. I use Internet occasionally for browsing and e-mail while he watches Netflix 24/7, shares a lot of data on torrent sites and who knows what else. We pay the same. As we should! Because both of us do have access to all of the Internet 24/7 at the same speed of access. That is what we are paying for. If at any moment I want to access Netflix same as him - I CAN! Does some factory need to churn more of that same Netflix content once I or him uses it? -NO. It is "just there" to be accessed. It would be there whether we watched it or not. That is the reason for the same pricing and insanity of "amount of usage" of something that is not spent.
Hence "amount of usage" is false concept. We pay for access to whole Internet at any moment at certain speed. That's it.
Comment on FCC Opens the Door for Metered Broadband by dusanmal
Backlink: http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fcc-opens-the-door-for-metered-web-access/#comment-530027
No comments:
Post a Comment