our columnist Daisann McLane argues against self-imposed baggage regulations.
I followed my fellow traveler Rolf Potts' "No Baggage" around the world stunt trip with a mixed feeling of awe and bewilderment. I was certainly impressed by Rolf's grit and determination to stay on the road for 30 days, carrying nothing but what he could stuff into a specially-designed, multi-pocket gear vest. But I wondered: what's the point?The trip's premise was that traveling with no baggage at all clears your path to more interesting, spontaneous and authentic travels. But I don't buy that. (I've actually had some interesting travel encounters because I was carrying baggage). Baggage isn't an obstacle, it's just a traveler's tool. And what takes up more travel energy--carrying a satchel or small suitcase, or doing laundry every single night and feeling yucky and damp all day?
I was also more than a little horrified at the idea of having to wear synthetic fabric T-shirts and underpants day in and day out. Especially because you would never catch me wearing T-shirts, synthetic underwear, cargo pants or multi-pocketed vests--unless, maybe, I was on a wilderness expedition or embedded with the Marines on assignment.
But the big reason I'd never want to do a "stripped to basics" trip is that it would make my travel far less interesting and enjoyable. Dressing for the day is one of my biggest travel pleasures. Just like I love trying out my skill with new languages, and sampling new foods, travel is an occasion for me to slip into different ways of adorning myself in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment