Showing posts with label we. Show all posts
Showing posts with label we. Show all posts

Friday, November 26, 2010

Twitter CEO: We Still Don't Know What Twitter Is For

dick costolo twitter ceo

In an interview with The Telegraph newspaper this morning, Twitter CEO Dick Costolo admitted that he's still trying to figure out Twitter's "long-term purpose."

Costolo, who took over for Evan Williams last month, said that he's "currently trying to define" what Twitter is going to become, and noted that users have come up with a lot of past innovations like the hashtag. 

Sources say that despite its fast user growth and the introduction of new revenue sources like sponsored tweets and selling access to data, Twitter still isn't booking a lot of revenue. On stage at Web 2.0, Williams didn't offer any revenue numbers for what he called the "promoted suite," saying only that demand was outstripping supply.

But that's a little bit misleading, as the Promoted Products Platform isn't open to general advertisers through a self-service platform (like Google's AdWords, for instance). Instead, Twitter's still selling it only to a select group of test advertisers, and everybody else is supposed to fill out a form for more information. It's easy for demand to outstrip supply when supply is artificially constrained.

Costolo is supposed to help navigate this transition, but it's a hard one: if Twitter sells too many ads, the signal-to-noise ratio will drop and users will abandon the service. He told The Telegraph that he'll have more information to share about Twitter's long-term plans in the "near future."

In addition to defining how Twitter's supposed to make money, Costolo is also dealing with growing pains. He noted that the company now has 325 people and is trying to figure out how to grow without creating crippling bureaucracy, and that it has a "scalability problem" that will soon require more data centers, particularly in Japan.

Apologies: this article originally miscredited the source. It's The Telegraph.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:




Twitter CEO: We Still Don't Know What Twitter Is For


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/pDULPmLJf9k/twitter-ceo-we-dont-have-long-term-plan-yet-2010-11

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Comment on Should We Be Afraid of Apple, Google and Facebook? by John Conor

The US DoJ uses a particular test to determine if a firm has monopoly power - the Herfindahl - Hirschmann index (HHI). Using this as the sole indicator, and thinking reasonably carefully about the markets in which each plays (search and web-delivered ads for the first, 'social network' connections for the second): Google and Facebook absolutely have monopoly power. The answers for the others are less clear. I have not read Prof. Wu's book (and can't get it except, ahem, to my Kindle, since I live in Asia), so cannot tell if he used the DoJ numerical definition, or how precisely he used term monopoly at all.

Comment on Should We Be Afraid of Apple, Google and Facebook? by John Conor


Backlink: http://gigaom.com/2010/11/25/tim-wu-google-facebook/#comment-524183

Comment on Should We Be Afraid of Apple, Google and Facebook? by eideard

The paranoid rarely change - except, occasionally, the direction of their fears. A foolish waste of time and energy.

Comment on Should We Be Afraid of Apple, Google and Facebook? by eideard


Backlink: http://gigaom.com/2010/11/25/tim-wu-google-facebook/#comment-523837

Comment on Should We Be Afraid of Apple, Google and Facebook? by PRETHOUGHT

Yeah, tell me about it. Now complete proud owner Novell! 420 million dollars worth to MS and then the rest to Attachmate another company owned by MS just to make it look like it's not an anti-trust case. Android and Linux users be prepared for the MS lawsuit assaults!!!!! In 2011 the battle royal against open source will begin!

Comment on Should We Be Afraid of Apple, Google and Facebook? by PRETHOUGHT


Backlink: http://gigaom.com/2010/11/25/tim-wu-google-facebook/#comment-523821

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Here's How Amazon Took The Lead In The Billion Dollar EBook Market -- And Why We Think They'll Dominate (AMZN)

jeff bezos amazon

The most interesting thing about last night's report that the ebook market will reach $1 billion this year wasn't so much that number -- through it's impressive, especially considering the growth rate -- but that Amazon has a full 50% marketshare there thanks to its Kindle platform.

When Apple announced the iPad with its iBookstore many people thought the inferior Kindle would be toast, but by letting people read Kindle books on any device, Amazon has preserved, and even arguably gained, marketshare. Today, most of the people who read books on iPad do it on the Kindle app.

The ebook market is a battle of the titans. It's Amazon versus Apple versus Barnes & Noble versus Sony. It also crucially involves all the big publishers, who are scared of going digital but know they must embrace it lest they go the way of the music industry, and so have been taking two steps forward and one step back.

But Amazon played beautifully every step of the game. And now, in a market that is growing very big, very fast, and probably has strong network effects, it has an early lead which makes us think it will end up dominating it. In fact, we think Amazon's marketshare will end up closer to 90%.

Here's how it happened and why we think Amazon can't be stopped.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:





Post originale: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/aAjPCo8YMQg/amazon-billion-dollar-ebook-market-amzn-2010-11

Monday, November 8, 2010

Cartoon: Apparently, We DO Need Those Stinking Badges (ReadWriteWeb)

I'm suddenly seeing badges everywhere. Location-aware apps like Foursquare and Gowalla award them for things like visiting more than four venues in one night (the "crunked" badge) or checking into the kind of venue known for a particular personality type (the "douchebag" badge). And now I'm getting badges in nearly every game and entertainment app I use, often with oddly low standards and...

Source : ReadWriteWeb

Explore : Read Write Web, Technology, Web 2



Post originale: http://wik.io/info/US/227079150

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Spotify: We Are Not For Sale

The latest rumor to hit is Apple might be interested in buying Spotify, a hot music startup based in Sweden. And there is news that Google almost bought them for $1 billion last year. What does the company say to all that? It's not for sale.

Post originale: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OmMalik/~3/3cJQt5TQ9u8/