Showing posts with label serious. Show all posts
Showing posts with label serious. Show all posts

Monday, March 21, 2011

Watch Out PayPal, Facebook Is Getting Serious About Payments (EBAY)

Facebook credits

How committed is Facebook about broadening its revenue streams beyond advertising?

So serious that it’s formed a subsidiary, Facebook Payments, Inc., and is registering it in a host of states.

The move could signal an intent by the world’s largest social network to get more broadly involved in the payments business, while also making its business operations more efficient. Right now, it appears unlikely that Facebook will roll out any kind of consumer-facing payments service analogous to eBay’s PayPal — but it could set the stage for such a move down the line.

The subsidiary was formed in Florida in December 2010. Facebook CFO David Ebersman, general counsel Ted Ullyot, and vice president of business development Dan Rose form the entity’s board. Facebook is hiring a controller for the business, which it describes as a “rapid growth, very dynamic subsidiary.” (Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Facebook Payments.)

Facebook is already in the payments business in a big way. While most consumers use the site for free, it processes hundreds of millions of dollars a year in payments from advertisers. As well, it has a modest but fast-growing business in Facebook Credits, a Facebook-only currency it sells to consumers to let them buy virtual goods in games like Zynga’s FarmVille and Crowdstar’s Happy Island. Facebook splits revenue from Facebook Credits with app developers, meaning it has to disburse funds as well as collecting them.

When you handle that kind of money, credit-card processing fees add up fast. Facebook Payments could form direct ties to Visa and MasterCard’s payment networks, cutting out a merchant-bank middleman and saving on costs.

Also, state and federal regulators tend to take an interest in sizeable money flows. Facebook’s move to register Facebook Payments in multiple states suggests that its subsidiary will take on the prodigious task of complying with a host of local regulations. Early on, PayPal struggled with a similar regulatory burden — but doing so gave it an advantage competitors which hadn’t done so. Facebook board member Peter Thiel, a cofounder and former CEO of PayPal, is certainly familiar with this history.

One other reason why Facebook might need a Facebook Payments subsidiary: the possibility, long rumored in the industry, that Facebook could start its own ad network in competition with Google’s AdSense, which places ads on third-party websites and shares revenues with their publishers. Facebook already has planted a presence across hundreds of thousands of websites with its “Like” and “Share” buttons, comment functions, and other social plugins. It would be easy for Facebook to sign those publishers up for an advertising network powered by Facebook’s detailed demographic information. But then it would have to start cutting checks on a massive scale — something that would be eased by a dedicated payments-processing operation.

Facebook must also be preparing for a future in which mobile payments become big. Facebook mobile chief Erick Tseng said at last year’s MobileBeat 2010 conference that it wants its mobile platform to offer the same features as its Web platform. That presumably includes Credits and other payments functionality.

Finally, we’ve heard murmurs from inside Facebook’s developer community that the social network really wants to push e-commerce on its platform. While Facebook has abandoned past attempts at selling directly to consumers, including a virtual gifts business and a classifieds-ads offering, it makes sense that it would want to run the payments part of any commerce happening on its platform.

And there’s something powerful about the idea of transactions between people with verified, real identities; one has to think Facebook would have an advantage in controlling fraud over rivals like eBay and Amazon.com.

Facebook’s formation of a subsidiary doesn’t make any of these possibilities a guaranteed outcome, of course. But it certainly lays the groundwork for moves that could rattle PayPal, Amazon.com, and the banking industry.

This post originally appeared at VentureBeat.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:






Watch Out PayPal, Facebook Is Getting Serious About Payments (EBAY)


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/Xpx7dEaIj3I/watch-out-paypal-facebook-is-getting-serious-about-payments-2011-3

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Gawker's Sales Boss Chris Batty Leaving After Serious Disagreement With Nick Denton About Strategy

chris batty

More news out of Gawker today. Sales boss Chris Batty is leaving to start his own venture, and he's bringing fellow salesman Michael Casco with him.

In an email to staff explaining the move, Gawker boss Nick Denton says, "Chris and I diverge seriously over strategy. That spilled over into unhealthy conflict between editorial and sales."

But, things must not have gotten too bad between Denton and Batty, because he also says, "Gawker Media will be both a partner and an investor" in Batty's new advertising venture.

Here's the email from Denton to the staff:

Yes, this may be a shock to some of you. Chris Batty and Michael Cascio, Gawker Media's long-time head of sales and marketing and sales leader, are leaving the company at the end of December. In the new year, we will begin a search for a replacement; we will be looking at candidates both from the digital world and those with TV experience. Chris will coordinate the recruitment. Applicants should contact him directly. In the interim, the sales operation will be overseen by Gabriela, who first brought Chris in.


It's easier than usual to give the corporate bromides about departing colleagues -- because Batty and Cascio have such an impressive track record. No exaggeration is needed. Under Chris -- and with help from Gaby Darbyshire's international deals -- the company's annual revenue has increased tenfold. The increase since 2005 translates into a 56% annual growth rate. This quarter will be by some margin our largest ever. Chris and Michael are ending on the highest of notes.



Here's just a selection of the great calls that Chris made: the eviction of the ad networks that were undercutting our premium positioning; the establishment of a creative services unit to work on custom implementations for clients; sponsored posts, advertorial content in the main flow of the sites; the introduction of custom marquee and panorama units commanding higher rates than standard IAB units.



Above all, he pushed Gawker Media to professionalize: to go beyond the fly-by-night approach of the early years, recognize that we had become a serious business, and push for proper office space, 401k plans and the other trappings of a real company.



I've known Chris a decade, since in San Francisco he nearly siphoned off $500,000 from my last company, an act of salesmanship which cemented my respect for his talents. Sure, we've rowed over everything from politics to page layout. But that's been part of the fun; and the arguments have generally led to better decisions.



There is one disagreement that became harder to attribute to creative tension. Our sites are allergic to corporate boilerplate, so I'm going to be explicit. Chris and I diverge seriously over strategy. That spilled over into unhealthy conflict between editorial and sales. The clash is not quite as simple as audience versus revenue. After all, it's that ever-growing and upscale readership that draws advertisers; and, as Chris often pointed out, it's ad sales that fund editorial. The two should be in symbiosis.



However, of all media companies, Gawker Media is one that has built itself around audience growth, in the belief that advertising will follow. That isn't the only media strategy available; it just happens to be the one that we chose; and it is to that which everybody signs up when joining the company.



Chris will be launching a new advertising venture; Gawker Media will be both a partner and an investor. I'm glad he will have the opportunity finally to be his own boss -- as other Gawker alumni such as Lockhart Steele and Choire Sicha have done.



As for Gawker's own future plans: tomorrow afternoon, Tom will present the upcoming release of the sites; Gabs will run through the proposed ad offering associated with it; and I will try to explain how it all hangs together in the 2011 plan, a written copy of which is being sent to you.



I'm not going to say any more now. I'm assuming you'll need today to begin digesting the news. Gabs will be contacting you to schedule a session tomorrow morning for sales and marketing, to deal with your questions. Chris and Michael will kick off the meeting. And of course Gabs and I are both around today for anyone who wants to talk.



Nick

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:




Gawker's Sales Boss Chris Batty Leaving After Serious Disagreement With Nick Denton About Strategy


Backlink: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/x1DP3rFB-4g/gawkers-sales-bosses-chris-batty-is-out-2010-11

Monday, November 8, 2010

Twitter Gets Serious About Location Based Services, Businesses Can Claim Locations (The Blog Herald)

In a move that places Twitter in direct competition with other location based services including Foursquare and Gowalla, the social networking company has announced the option for businesses to claim their locations. The new feature, which shows up in the users feed can be seen in the screen capture on this page (located above). The [...]

Source : The Blog Herald

Explore : Blogosphere, Foursquare, Social Network, Technology, Twitter



Post originale: http://wik.io/info/US/227126788