Showing posts with label because. Show all posts
Showing posts with label because. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Going Back to College - Because There are IT Jobs on Campus

When I was in college a generation ago, campus IT consisted of a DEC mainframe in the basement of the history building, a human-operated telephone switchboard, and phone extensions in dormitory hallways. Of course I wish I could go back and do it all over with the technology and tools that kids have today. When I think of all the papers I had to retype...

Recently I looked at my alma mater's IT page on its website (a shock in and of itself). I found that incoming students are expected to have smartphones, laptops, Apple AirPorts and iPads. They don't need printers since they can use shared printers through the campus-wide WiFi network. They can store documents in a centralized network storage space. Satellite TV hookups are provided and professors are learning about the newest version of Blackboard, the course management software that's become standard equipment at colleges everywhere.

Someone has to set up and maintain all that infrastructure. Job hunters sometimes overlook IT in education, in part because we can forget to explore the huge non-profit sector. So here's a reminder that on-campus IT jobs are out there. You just have to look for them, even though finding them isn't particularly easy.

Where are the College IT Jobs?

In a quick survey of some big-name public and private universities, I found that college IT jobs are identified differently from institution to institution. Sometimes, they're lumped in with other "staff" postings. I found interesting positions at the University of California Berkeley, the University of Texas and Princeton, but it took a while. At Carnegie Mellon in Pittsburgh, regarded as one of the most wired campuses in the world, I stumbled across dozens of security-related jobs. It took me a few minutes to realize they were related to the university's Software Engineering Institute and its famous Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT). These were jobs worth seeking out.

As I continued to browse CMU's Web site, I read about "Wireless Andrew 2," the campus WiFi network, which delivers 100 Mbps access to more than 8,000 people throughout the 4 million square feet of interior space on the 105-acre campus. (Here's a short video.) Interestingly, Wireless Andrew began in 1994 as a project funded by the National Science Foundation to test wireless network technology. Soon after the project was running, the demand for network access was enormous. It was WiFi before WiFi existed. Wouldn't it be cool to go to work every day and be surrounded by the kinds of people who think up these ideas?

On Dice, a quick way to discover the kinds of educational IT jobs available is to perform a search with the word "university," then sort by "company." There are dozens of jobs throughout the nation, covering all aspects of IT - hardware, software, development, security, etc.

At my alma mater, it looks like the IT department is fully staffed for the fall semester, but who knows? If its attempt to match CMU's 100 Mbps WiFi network, it'll certainly need a few more talented people. 

 -- Don Willmott



Post originale: http://career-resources.dice.com/articles/content/entry/back_to_wired_school

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Just Because Apps are Free, Doesn't Mean There's No Money to Be Made

Android-Market-300x300.jpgToday's article in The New York Times (see: "App Makers Take Interest in Android") focused on the growing Android app ecosystem, and the unfortunate side effect of being a Google-led project: people aren't used to paying for Google services and that mentality extends to Android.

But developers, take heart: making your app a free download doesn't mean you don't get paid, a point the NYT article practically glossed over, preferring to focus on Android's other issues, like its fragmentation, use of Google Checkout for buying apps, lack of in-app purchases and more.

Sponsor

Despite the positive-sounding headline, the NYT article was actually negative in tone, starting off with a joke about how an Android developer making $1-$2 per day on his app was laughed at by his peers, while insisting "that's pretty good money!"

The blows against Android then continue with a quote from Matt Hall, co-founder of Larva Labs, who talked about the problems with Google Checkout. Then Rovio's (maker of Angry Birds) Peter Vesterbacka complained about the challenges of developing for such a fragmented environment. And then it was Hall again, with a quote that's already getting repeated on Apple-watching blogs like John Gruber’s Daring Fireball:

"Google is not associated with things you pay for, and Android is an extension of that," said Mr. Hall of Larva Labs. "You don't pay for Google apps, so it bleeds into the expectations for the third-party apps, too."

There Are Ways to Get Paid

If you want to debate the merit of the above statements, feel free to head to the comments section, but we feel the need to point out the obvious miss from the NYT article: there are alternative revenue streams for developers besides direct app sales. (After all, even Google's "free" services aren't actually free - they're monetized through advertising.)

We recently highlighted some findings related to this matter earlier this month. For example, research from mobile ad company Millennial Media found that Android ad revenue has, for the first time ever, beaten iPhone ad revenue on the company's ad network.

At the time, we wondered why, given the lower ad impression numbers (as compared with iPhone/iOS). As it turns out, Millennial's Michael Avon had some thoughts on the matter. Besides the fact that there is simply less ad inventory amid soaring demand on Android, he also shared that Android is currently a "hot" platform for advertisers as it allows them to reach first-time smartphone buyers and a more diverse set of consumers.

"We believe some advertisers are paying a premium to reach those users early in their smartphone experience," he said. "Our advertisers have also shared that Android allows them to reach a diverse set of consumers across all major carriers, making the platform highly desirable and increasing demand for the platform...With more advertiser demand per each available impression on Android, it resulted in more revenue per impression."

The NYT article also makes brief mention of the lack of an in-app purchases model for Android, another disappointment for developers, especially since we recently learned that in-app purchases generate more revenue than ads, in some app categories.

However, as we also noted last week, developers don't have to wait on Google to implement an official in-app purchase mechanism, because there are several third-party solutions already available, including Boku and Zong for virtual goods and PayPal's in-app purchases technology for physical goods.

NYT had one good thing to say about Android development: because of the store sizes (100K vs 300K apps/Android vs iPhone) it's easier to get noticed in the Android Market today than it is in the iTunes App Store. Well, at least there's that.

Discuss





Post originale: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/ExSjR0q-zcE/just-because-apps-are-free-doesnt-mean-theres-no-money.php

Monday, October 18, 2010

Parents Aren't Worried About Facebook Privacy, Partly Because They Don't Understand It

britishteenagers

Facebook is in the news yet again over privacy concerns today. These issues are a constant topic of discussion in the tech media, but it's less clear how much of the uproar ever filters down to the average user.

So it's great timing for TRUSTe to drop the results of a recent survey (PDF) on how teens and their parents use social networks, and what they think about privacy issues related to them.

The main takeaways from the survey:

  • The vast majority of teens and their parents are comfortable with privacy on social networks, and nearly all parents think their teens use social networks responsibly.
  • On the other hand, parents feel pretty strongly that it should be impossible for their teens to share as much information as they can as broadly as they can. So it looks like parents don't understand Facebook privacy as well as they think they do.
  • Most parents monitor their teens' online behavior closely, and want full control over what their teens share. A full 10% even admitted to secretly obtaining login access to their teens' accounts.
Click here for everything you need to know about teens, their parents, and social networks →

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:





Post originale: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider/~3/fAUWJXJ2wtg/teens-and-social-networking-2010-10